|
LMMFAO. Even more overstated than I was expecting......
By:
Phred (Moderators; 50060)
Posted on: 06-28-2012 14:46.
Client: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0.1
IP: Logged
Message views: 63 (Score: 0)
...
For all these reasons, to say that the Individual Man-date merely imposes a tax is not to interpret the statute but to rewrite it. Judicial tax-writing is particularly troubling. Taxes have never been popular, see, e.g., Stamp Act of 1765, and in part for that reason, the Constitution requires tax increases to originate in the House of Repre-sentatives. See Art. I, ยง7, cl. 1. That is to say, they must originate in the legislative body most accountable to the people, where legislators must weigh the need for the tax against the terrible price they might pay at their next election, which is never more than two years off.
...
Yeah. VOTE ROMNEY. It's so clear now. LMMFAO. Your "sources" are more than just a wee bit hysterical.
Edited by Phred at 6/28/2012 2:47:55 PM
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-393c3a2.pdf
"One of the things about Herman Cain is, I think that he makes that white Republican base, uh, of the party feel okay, feel like they are not racist because they can like this guy. I think he is giving that base a free pass. And I think they like him because they think he's a black man who knows his place. I know that's harsh, but that's how it sure seems to me." -- Karen Finney
========================================
You do not have the required security level to post to this thread.
Report a Bug!
|
