• $28.12 and counting.[nt] - Paul,  05-30-2012 18:38 (Views: 22)
• $28 was the initial low valuation ... - Catfish,  05-30-2012 23:10 (Views: 24)
• Speaking of con jobs- oh yeah- tough schit Schilling! :p - MacHead,  05-30-2012 11:07 (Views: 31)
• Buddy Scianci wouldn't have let this happen. [nt] - Catfish,  05-30-2012 11:32 (Views: 34)
• That's for sure - MacHead,  05-30-2012 13:37 (Views: 23)
• NASDAQ doesn`t issue `please explain price/volume change` notices? - enet,  05-29-2012 21:49 (Views: 42)
• Good lord, onerous regulations? Not us ... - Catfish,  05-29-2012 22:00 (Views: 36)
• It's basically about continuous disclosure, where the market asks for a response to this: - enet,  05-29-2012 22:40 (Views: 38)
• Well in Facebook's case no new info wold be needed - Sycraft,  05-30-2012 09:30 (Views: 29)
• I just find it odd they've had no announcements... [nt] - enet,  05-30-2012 10:54 (Views: 31)
• Ya well two reasons - Sycraft,  05-30-2012 11:30 (Views: 25)
• we'll see what happens [nt] - enet,  05-30-2012 12:57 (Views: 29)
• I read an article that said to make Facebook a "buy" the stock price`d have to be between $13-16 based on current and projected earnings. [n - Citizen Z,  05-30-2012 09:35 (Views: 26)
• Loving it :) [nt] - Glenn,  05-29-2012 19:39 (Views: 21)
• It's like any number of 1990s .coms all over again n/t - Sydwyndir,  05-29-2012 19:32 (Views: 34)
• GEOSHITTIES!!! [nt] - Mr. Spork,  05-29-2012 23:46 (Views: 28)
• You hear this bit about them supposedly switching to NYSE? - Paul,  05-29-2012 19:08 (Views: 34)

You do not have the required security level to post to this thread.

Report a Bug!